What a load of bullshit!
I received an email from my ex, asking me for some information regarding child support that I had been paying, and she was adamant in her stance that I am underpaying child support.
First, I don't know how I am underpaying child support when the kids are well rounded enough to go on a cruise every year, and of course, a trip to DisneyWorld every winter.
Needless to say, her contacting me was suspicious, until I found out the reason! It seems that the federal government in all it's wisdom, increased the amounts to be paid, in my income bracket, by 15-20%!!!
The ex seems to think that she should get more, because the little darlings are doing without SOOOOOO much these days...I can't help but ask my 8 year old daughter if she is having problems with her cable tv in her room...
Here is the details...you can decide if I should continue to fight this or not.
I currently pay $1288 a month in child support and daycare expenses (kids are 8 and 12, by the way), which is based on an established income of $87,000 a year. For the last 5 years (the order is dated July 2001), my income has been around $72,000 a year, which means I am and have been paying in excess what I should be paying. Why am I? Well, I was going to wait until the divorce proceedings were started, then drop the bombshell about the lower income, and get the support reduced. Needless to say, I have been overpaying my child support since separation (I know, no kudos please, for not being a deadbeat dad...)
When I look at the new amount, I can't help but think, whats wrong with this picture? The new amount ends up being around $1500 a month. By the time I pay taxes on my gross income, pay support after that, and then all the other miscellaneous deductions, there isn't much left. Living in the city takes a big chunk of change that is left.
I had sent an email to my MP to get some answers. Just because there has been a change in taxation, I have to fork out more money for support? Get real...
It's time like this, that I can't help but think that if any one wants to wonder why there are deadbeat dads, look at my case...I bring in $6,000 a month gross income, and by the time I am raped and pillaged, I have $1900 left for myself...add to that my rent of $700, car insurance, etc., there isn't much left...and the government thinks there is a hardship case for my kids?
Fuck off...this time I am not going to take it laying down. You can be rest assured that this is now a priority ranting topic of mine for the months to come.
I plan on representing myself in court, and fight for the injustice of single dads everywhere. Enough is enough...time to take back our dignity, and let our asses heal.
More on this topic as things roll out. The current situation is that my ex wants to go to mediation to resolve. My money is on the fact that she won't like it owing me money, so we will be off to the courthouse sooner rather than later...wish me luck...
Sunday, May 14, 2006
Saturday, April 08, 2006
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
GM's Help From the Union
In order to balance the blasting I gave the unions the other day, I thought it only fair to give an alternative that might be considered by Delphi and GM workers, to temporarily help GM, and still maintain an advantage;
1) The biggest issue with GM and falling market share is that no one is buying the cars that they make - 2 reasons for this - first, the styling needs to be more radical (like the Cadillac turnaround, and Chrysler 300). Second, vehicle reliability needs to become #1 among the top 6. If vehicle reliability is better, then the price can be higher, and incentives less (take a page from Toyota). GM, your consumers will pay a higher price or ask for less incentives, if you have a good product!
2) Even if GM sticks with the current models over the next 2 years, the union should offer a cut in base wage, and move to an incentive system, which will pay more, if, GM hits #1 in reliability for a model or product. This would be financed by the increase in price (decrease in incentives), and would cost GM nothing. However, the plan would have to be set up to offer something for the union...if I had the numbers, I could crunch through them to see what they would be like, but even a reduction of $1000 in incentives paid per vehicle (assuming 4,000,000 vehicles a year - 25% market share), would give GM about $4 billion in extra cash every year...
The trend these days is to pay for performance...the union has to accept that, and if the employees are willing to sacrifice to improve performance, they should be rewarded for it. Something to consider, rather than just talking pay cuts. You need to offset the pay cut with an improvement in performance and to the bottom line, in order to make it worthwhile.
GM lacks a long term plan to bring the glory back to where it was, for any employee that works for them. If Rick Wagoner reads this, maybe he will understand that a long term plan has to include results to the bottom line, AND to product improvement, not only in styling, but reliability.
By the way, I do not work for any of the automakers...but I would be willing to talk with Jerome York, or anyone else at GM Detroit, next time I am in Windsor...;)
1) The biggest issue with GM and falling market share is that no one is buying the cars that they make - 2 reasons for this - first, the styling needs to be more radical (like the Cadillac turnaround, and Chrysler 300). Second, vehicle reliability needs to become #1 among the top 6. If vehicle reliability is better, then the price can be higher, and incentives less (take a page from Toyota). GM, your consumers will pay a higher price or ask for less incentives, if you have a good product!
2) Even if GM sticks with the current models over the next 2 years, the union should offer a cut in base wage, and move to an incentive system, which will pay more, if, GM hits #1 in reliability for a model or product. This would be financed by the increase in price (decrease in incentives), and would cost GM nothing. However, the plan would have to be set up to offer something for the union...if I had the numbers, I could crunch through them to see what they would be like, but even a reduction of $1000 in incentives paid per vehicle (assuming 4,000,000 vehicles a year - 25% market share), would give GM about $4 billion in extra cash every year...
The trend these days is to pay for performance...the union has to accept that, and if the employees are willing to sacrifice to improve performance, they should be rewarded for it. Something to consider, rather than just talking pay cuts. You need to offset the pay cut with an improvement in performance and to the bottom line, in order to make it worthwhile.
GM lacks a long term plan to bring the glory back to where it was, for any employee that works for them. If Rick Wagoner reads this, maybe he will understand that a long term plan has to include results to the bottom line, AND to product improvement, not only in styling, but reliability.
By the way, I do not work for any of the automakers...but I would be willing to talk with Jerome York, or anyone else at GM Detroit, next time I am in Windsor...;)
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
GM Woes - Idled Workers Freeloading
I have always maintained that GM has bigger problems, than just with models that don't sell and sit well with the public. The issue at hand, when you see the article above (click title to take you to NYT article), is the sense of entitlement that GM workers have, especially within the rank and file in the Jobs Bank.
Faced with huge legacy costs, all these "laid off" workers, for the lack of a better term, feel it is their right to sit and collect a full pay, with no onus on them to move on to something else in their lives. The fact is, today workers have to prepare themselves for the worst that may come in their working lives.
It was a generation ago, that workers were still relying on sticking with a company until retirement. My generation has learned the lesson well -- the only person who will take care of yourself is you. No union is going to take care of you...an individual has to look out for themselves, and ensure that they are marketable, and if that means moving from company to company, so be it.
GM workers are a generation behind in their thinking, and this will not change the outlook for GM, even with the buyouts, until the workers take ownership for making the company profitable. Having a sense of entitlement with a company does not bode well in the economy these days, and surely will doom any company with ever-increasing legacy costs. The steel companies in the US learned the hard way, but the workers adapted, and finally came to the realization that in order to keep up with the global economy, changes were needed, and all the unions pushing for better benefits eventually crushed the livelihoods of many.
GM, continue on with your cutting and slashing...maybe the employees will eventually get the picture when you have to shed the legacy costs. There is no reason why you can't turn the corner and increase margins to 10% to at least compete with the foreign automakers...$65 a hour for "semi-skilled" labour is a thing of the past...and the union should be ashamed for even putting the company in this position of "better than middle class" lifestyle for uneducated line jobs.
The reality of it all, is that I am sure GM will fall further behind, until all the deadwood is removed. Maybe bankruptcy isn't such a bad thing, to finally make the unions open their eyes. You can't have everything.
Faced with huge legacy costs, all these "laid off" workers, for the lack of a better term, feel it is their right to sit and collect a full pay, with no onus on them to move on to something else in their lives. The fact is, today workers have to prepare themselves for the worst that may come in their working lives.
It was a generation ago, that workers were still relying on sticking with a company until retirement. My generation has learned the lesson well -- the only person who will take care of yourself is you. No union is going to take care of you...an individual has to look out for themselves, and ensure that they are marketable, and if that means moving from company to company, so be it.
GM workers are a generation behind in their thinking, and this will not change the outlook for GM, even with the buyouts, until the workers take ownership for making the company profitable. Having a sense of entitlement with a company does not bode well in the economy these days, and surely will doom any company with ever-increasing legacy costs. The steel companies in the US learned the hard way, but the workers adapted, and finally came to the realization that in order to keep up with the global economy, changes were needed, and all the unions pushing for better benefits eventually crushed the livelihoods of many.
GM, continue on with your cutting and slashing...maybe the employees will eventually get the picture when you have to shed the legacy costs. There is no reason why you can't turn the corner and increase margins to 10% to at least compete with the foreign automakers...$65 a hour for "semi-skilled" labour is a thing of the past...and the union should be ashamed for even putting the company in this position of "better than middle class" lifestyle for uneducated line jobs.
The reality of it all, is that I am sure GM will fall further behind, until all the deadwood is removed. Maybe bankruptcy isn't such a bad thing, to finally make the unions open their eyes. You can't have everything.
Saturday, March 25, 2006
Stay Away from Birds that Smoke
Interesting article at CNN...it seems that the bird flu virus is deep in their respiratory tract, which is one of the reasons why humans don't get it that easy...
I guess, as a precaution, I should watch out if I am hanging around birds that smoke, or birds that can hork up a nice lugee...
I guess, as a precaution, I should watch out if I am hanging around birds that smoke, or birds that can hork up a nice lugee...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
